Prores 422 Lt Vs 422 Which Best for Editing

Thanks for any thoughts or advise you may have here. ProRes 4444 XQ 444 Finishing ProRes 4444 444 Finishing ProRes 422 HQ 422 Mezzanine ProRes 422 422 Mezzanine ProRes 422 LT 422 SQ Editorial ProRes 422 Proxy 422 LQ Editorial.

How Prores Raw Is Going To Change The Way You Work

If you want a codec with good playback in editing application while being small this can do.

. Anyway Id strongly suggest not to use Prores Proxy or LT over the LongGOP for grading. ProRes 422 LT aims for 102Mbps which still looks great if youre getting a sensor readout over HDMI and will serve you much better in. The data rate of 422 Proxy is low which means the files are relatively small.

Offers nearly all the benefits of ProRes 422 HQ but at only 66 of the data rate. ProRes has gained in popularity as an intermediate codec Paul 2015. Mixing ProRes 422 LT 422 clips in same sequence FCP I was handed a drive of mixed XDCAM EX DSLR footage mostly already transcoded ProRes LT.

I will add most DSLR bitrates are 50Mbps and ProRes LT is 99Mbps which is double the databit-rate and with 422 color space whoever informed your DP is incorrect. ProRes 422 175MBsec ProRes 422 LT 122MBsec ProRes 422 Proxy 56MBsec 25p RAW on BMPC4K 85MBframe 2125MBsec plus audio ProRes data rates for UHD 25p. Would not suggest it for editing.

Apple ProRes 422 LT is a more highly compressed codec than Apple ProRes 422 with roughly 70 percent of the data rate and 30 percent smaller file sizes. I cannot see a visual benefit to using 4444 vs. However as the technology find s its place to a much brighter advancement here comes the ProRes.

The target data rate is approximately 102 Mbps at 1920x1080 and 2997 fps. I understand the difference between ProRes 422 at 1920x1080x60i is a max 145 Mbps vs 220 Mbps with HQ. But if you are shooting green screen stuff youd probably want the extra info for keying.

A high-quality compressed codec offering nearly all the benefits of Apple ProRes 422 HQ but at 66 percent of the data rate for even better multistream real-time editing performance. 4444 gives full color bandwidth on all channels plus an Alpha Channel which is need for graphics fx and compositing work. With the 4K camera standard ProRes 422 at 3840 x 2160 will give more than an hour on a 240GB or 256GB SSD which is much more doable for lots of productions.

422 proxy 50 Mbps low 422 LT 100 Mbps med 422 150 Mbps high 422 HQ 225 Mbps very high 4444 325 Mbps extreme 11. From lowest to highest quality it goes. It has a target data rate of 102 Mbps.

The target data is 147 Mbps. Using the ProRes 422 HQ codec as intended it delivers as promised and a bit better than expected. In 4K youd sit at 182Mb and 410Mb respectively both at 30p.

707Mbs ProRes 422 HQ. HttpbitlyVideo422HQThis video show all possible combinations with Prores PROXY LT 422 HQ on. I always shoot for 422 or 422 HQ - never using LT - and need to transcode some additional footage from both cameras.

November 2 2010 at 702 pm. The frame was virtually black. 145Mbs ProRes 422 Proxy.

From an experienced editors perspective which format would you recommend using and why. At the lowest compression ProRes Proxy the Pocket will be able to record around 4 hours on one 64GB card and at the still very high-quality ProRes 422 youll get over an hour. ProRes 422 is better for editing because you can color correct and add effects without losing quality.

Now I have a more clear idea of which clips I will use I converted for one scene all their original H264 movs to ProRes 422 instead of just proxy and also ProRes 4444 to compare. ProRes LT retains better overall image quality compared to ProRes Proxy as it includes every pixel in the clip and it doubles the bitrate of the latter. Up to 28 cash back ProRes 422.

ProRes 422 HQ 1035MBsec ProRes 422 691MBsec ProRes 422 LT 481MBsec ProRes 422 Proxy 216MBsec. Compared to the background and theoretical knowledge you may be more interested in the. Yes it is faster on the CPU.

As a result ProRes 422 offers even better real-time editing performance. To compare both H264 is much more compressed than ProRes 422. Most of my video is shot in 1920x1080x60i.

This version of the codec has 70 of the data rate of ProRes 422 and 30 smaller file sizes. Now the GH5 is also capable of shooting All-I h264 10bit 422 at 200Mb in HD so that may be the better mode to compare. Apple ProRes 422.

Although the quality is also noticeably worse. 422 HQ when transcoding DSLR footage. The target data rate of Apple ProRes 422 is approximately 147 Mbps at 1920 x 1080 and 2997 fps.

This is because h264 is a much more efficient codec than ProRes. ProRes vs H264 it is hard to judge which one is better as each of them can be used as the best video codec under certain circumstancesIn simple words Apple ProRes codec is designed for post-production while H264 codec is widely used in video deliverydistribution. Placed in a timeline on top of the orignal mater changed the composite mode to Difference and.

Apple ProRes 422 vs Apple ProRes 422 HQ. Ive used this version of the codec in the past for multi-cam editing on a late 2007 Macbook Pro and it works like a. The target data rate of Apple ProRes 422 LT is approximately 102 Mbps at 1920 x 1080 and 2997 fps.

This codec is perfect for environments where storage capacity and data rate are at a premium. You might think that all you need is to match the camera bitrate 100Mbps but you actually need to greatly exceed the camera bitrate. Imported the ProRes material back into the FCP 6 project.

Download highest quality exported video at 422 HQ 342GB. Doubling the bitrate and at least preserving the lossy image resolution at ProRes LT is the smarter choice to edit in to avoid all of those nasty Out of Memory Errors typically associated. Yes the editing experience is way more fluid.

I dont know what it stands for technically but its basically Lite as in lightweight which is how I think of it. Your cameras internal codec will have a compressed data rate of anywhere from 20Mbps to 70mbps usually variable. The file size is smaller and since at that point I had many clips undecided whether to use them or not that was best for the moment to save disk space and would use less RAM in FCP.

Apple literature highlights the value of Apple ProRes 422 LT as an editing codec stating that it is perfect for environments where storage capacity and data rate are at a premium In order to compare the members of the ProRes 422 family this Web site uses 10-bit picture data with an HD 1920x1080 frame size and a frame rate of 2997 fps. 328Mbs ProRes 422 LT. Apple ProRes 422 Proxy.

Fcp 7 Pick The Right Version Of Prores Larry Jordan

Which Prores Codec To Use Fk Tech Final Kid Films

Which Prores Codec To Use Fk Tech Final Kid Films